🤖 AI Verdict
✅ Switch to Cap if
you value full control over your data, customization, and scalability. Cap is suitable for teams and organizations with technical expertise, seeking a self-hosted video messaging solution that can be tailored to their specific needs
⚠️ Stay with Loom if
you prioritize ease of use, a wide range of integrations, and robust video recording features. Loom is ideal for teams and individuals who need a hassle-free video messaging solution and are willing to compromise on data ownership and customization
Loom vs Cap
Overview
Loom and Cap are video messaging and screen recording tools designed to facilitate communication and collaboration among teams. Both tools offer features such as video recording, sharing, and editing, making this comparison beneficial for individuals and organizations seeking to improve their remote communication workflows. This comparison is particularly useful for teams, entrepreneurs, and professionals looking to enhance their virtual collaboration capabilities.Key Differences
- Cost: Loom offers a free plan and several paid tiers, while Cap is free for self-hosted deployments.
- Data ownership: Cap allows for full data ownership due to its self-hosting option, whereas Loom stores data on its servers.
- Setup complexity: Loom is generally easier to set up, with a more straightforward onboarding process, while Cap requires more technical expertise for self-hosting.
- Scalability: Both tools can scale to meet the needs of growing teams, but Cap's self-hosting option provides more control over scalability.
- Ecosystem: Loom integrates with a wider range of third-party tools and platforms, while Cap's ecosystem is more focused on open-source and self-hosted solutions.
Pricing Comparison
| Aspect | Loom | Cap |
|---|---|---|
| Base Cost | Free / $12.50–$14.99/user/month | Free (self-hosted) |
| License | Proprietary | AGPL 3.0 |
| Self-hosting | Not available | Available |
| Per-user cost at 50 users | $625-$749.50/month | $0 (self-hosted) |
Pros and Cons
Loom
Pros:- Easy to use and set up
- Wide range of integrations with third-party tools
- Robust features for video recording and editing
- Limited control over data storage and ownership
- Paid plans can become expensive for large teams
- Limited customization options
Cap
Pros:- Full control over data ownership and storage
- Highly customizable and extensible
- Free for self-hosted deployments
- Requires technical expertise for self-hosting
- Limited integrations with third-party tools
- Steeper learning curve
When to Choose Each
Loom
Choose Loom if you prioritize ease of use, a wide range of integrations, and robust video recording features. Loom is ideal for teams and individuals who need a hassle-free video messaging solution and are willing to compromise on data ownership and customization.Cap
Choose Cap if you value full control over your data, customization, and scalability. Cap is suitable for teams and organizations with technical expertise, seeking a self-hosted video messaging solution that can be tailored to their specific needs.Migration Path
To migrate from Loom to Cap, follow these steps:- Export your video recordings from Loom using their data export feature.
- Set up a self-hosted Cap instance, configuring the necessary infrastructure and settings.
- Import your exported video recordings into Cap, using their import tools or APIs.
Data sourced April 2026. Verify current pricing at https://loom.com and https://cap.so.
📦 Ready to switch?
Follow our step-by-step migration guide
🔔 Get Weekly Open Source Picks
New tool comparisons, self-hosting guides, and money-saving alternatives — every week. Free.
Found this helpful? Explore all comparisons.
← View All Comparisons